Home Free Library Store
Free Catalog



Save with a Two Year Membership

To post in the forums see the Forum Guidelines.
Join or Renew Today.
New Benefits for all VU Members
Forum Guidelines and FAQ
Main Index Search Posts
Who's Online Log In



Home: Video University Forums: Audio For Video:
thinking about getting the r44

 

 


Adam Forgione
Enthusiast

Oct 19, 2008, 11:29 PM

Post #1 of 6 (1063 views)
Shortcut
thinking about getting the r44 Can't Post

im curious if this unit can handle dymanics without having to constanly adjust input/output levels (low voice - loud band) like my old sony dsr390 in auto did so well.

also im curious from the users here what there configs are :

what mics and settings are you using on each channel and what source are you recording?

im thinking of running double wireless receivers (1 to the cam and 1 to the r44 on the same wireless channel) for backup. im so afraid ill rely on this thing and forget to start it during reception, ceremony, etc
Adam Forgione
Pennylane Productions


MLiebergot
Veteran


Oct 20, 2008, 6:36 AM

Post #2 of 6 (1058 views)
Shortcut
Re: [people9300] thinking about getting the r44 [In reply to] Can't Post

Adam, you name the situation for the R-44 to record in, and you can record it, no problem.
The R-44 has some great dynamic range and excellent built in limiter/pre amps.
But like ANY recording device, your results will vary if not setup correctly. Unfortunately there isn't a recorder alive that will be flawless with extreme audio shifts without the need fo a recording engineer to make the adjustments. Just as there is no video camera that will produce excellent results in all shooting conditions. For best results, it's always best to run setups on manual and adjust on the fly when needed. But there are steps one can take to produce satisfactory to stunning audio by setting up your audio setting properly beforehand. Which I know that you are aware of.

The first thing is, DON'T USE AUTO for critical audio. The results will very too much and I guarantee that you won't get consistant results.

In scenarios where you KNOW that you will have dramatic low/high db difference then you must setup the R-44, by splitting the difference so to speak.
Since you have 4 channels to work with, I would mic the low source separately and run it accordingly. Same goes for the extremely loud source.

Instead of you wireless config, I might recommend this setup for a wireless recording situation.
For a Ceremony (This will depend on how many wireless units you have, we have 4).
1. Wireless from Groom (CH1)
2. R-44 placed on lectern, run mic directly into (CH2)
3. Wireless mic on musicians (CH3)
4. Run wireless (stereo to mono mixdown of CH 1/2) out of R-44 via RCA Line out to your camera for monitor sync audio at your camera

Reception Audio (I prefer to mic the room or PA stack):
1. Mic PA stack woofer (CH1)
2. Mic PA stack tweeter (CH2)
3. Mic crowd for ambient non-critical audio (I use stereo AT822 mic which requires 2 channels XLR inputs on the R-44. Mic would face out away from the PA stack towards the crowd.) (CH 3/4)
4. Wireless RCA Line out of CH 1/2 to your camera for sync/monitor/backup audio. Use your onboard shotgun mic for interviews and ambient audio if needed.

Apply the onboard limiter to all channels (especially the ones that are going to be loud).
Audio gain levels will vary depending on what you are recording (I tend to use -35 DB pre amp setting for very loud and have the input trim about 1/4 of the way)

BTW, what you are commenting on how well your DSR390 was with extreme audio was due to using the onboard AGC audio. Which I don't like to use for critical audio, due to the recorder adjusting the noise floor for extreme low audio (audio hiss appears). Also in my opinion too much audio pumping can be created if there are extreme shifts in the audio levels.

If your recorder has good onboard limiters, as the R-44 does, then you are pretty good to go with not worrying about clipped audio. As well as nice quiet audio (no hiss) when you need to record quiet audio.

Michael

Cameras: (3) Sony FX1, Canon HV20
Audio: Marantz PMD620, Edirol R44, ZoomH4N, ZoomH2, Sennhesier G2
Mics: Rode NT5, Rode NT3, Rode M3, Rode NTG2, Shure SM57, AT822
Software: Sony Vegas, Final Cut Studio
Computer: MAC BABY! MacPro, MacBook Pro

(This post was edited by MLiebergot on Oct 20, 2008, 6:53 AM)


Adam Forgione
Enthusiast

Oct 20, 2008, 7:41 AM

Post #3 of 6 (1049 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MLiebergot] thinking about getting the r44 [In reply to] Can't Post

im still very intertested but if anyone hasnt used used the 390 before they wouldn't understand how good it was. the preamps and agc were so good. i was able to mic a really quiet church speaker and a loud loud band all in auto. no hiss, no clipping, no over compression. it was stunning everytime with no work. only had to set the wireless inputs/outputs properly one time and every gig was perfect audio.

i might add i am an audio freak myself. i owned a sound reinforcement company for years, produced and mixed numerous albums. im that guy who can tell you the exact frequency that is feeding back when the band is sound checking but wont say anything because i dont want them to think im telling them how to do their jobs, ha!

do you guys (everyone using the r44) use a sound tech on your gigs? if not how often do you make adjustments and at what times? my main concern is that you dont have time to get a proper sound check with the band and then you guess in manual, the reception starts and you have to run and gun it hoping it sounds good
Adam Forgione
Pennylane Productions


(This post was edited by people9300 on Oct 20, 2008, 7:45 AM)


MLiebergot
Veteran


Oct 20, 2008, 7:58 AM

Post #4 of 6 (1044 views)
Shortcut
Re: [people9300] thinking about getting the r44 [In reply to] Can't Post

I am a one man band most of the time. Especially in regards to running my audio.

I use Rode M3 condenser mics (with a built in switchable 0/-10/-25 db pad built in) so between that and the internal limiters and per amps in the R-44 really have had little to no problem with recordings.
Mark Foley can really attest to this more so than myself.

Also, one of the reasons that I like to run a wireless line out out of CH 1/2 from the R-44 is that I can monitor the audio in my camera and make any adjustments as needed during the reception (obviously not right away, but easily in enough time not to ruin an entire nights recording). I use Ch 1/2 to monitor because these are the channels that I am recording the musical and speech audio into, by doing a live mic woofer/tweeter recording.

In some instances, if I have enough time I might mic the instruments separately. This doesn't happen too often though. Also I would really need 2 R-44's to do this efficitetly, as 4 channels simply wouldn't be enough for my taste. I know that Mark does this, as you can sync up 2 R-44's to share timecode and one of the unit will control start/stop of the recording.

I know that Mark, has said that he pretty much sets the R-44 and has been able to forget about it.

Around here I have worked receptions with live bands, but for the most part it's been DJ's for wedding receptions and Mitzvah's and such.

Obviously as you know, if you are recording a band in a club, you usually have time to sit in on teh sound check and setup accordingly.

Michael

Cameras: (3) Sony FX1, Canon HV20
Audio: Marantz PMD620, Edirol R44, ZoomH4N, ZoomH2, Sennhesier G2
Mics: Rode NT5, Rode NT3, Rode M3, Rode NTG2, Shure SM57, AT822
Software: Sony Vegas, Final Cut Studio
Computer: MAC BABY! MacPro, MacBook Pro


Mark Foley
Veteran


Oct 20, 2008, 2:51 PM

Post #5 of 6 (1015 views)
Shortcut
Re: [people9300] thinking about getting the r44 [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
my main concern is that you dont have time to get a proper sound check with the band and then you guess in manual, the reception starts and you have to run and gun it hoping it sounds good

This is where the R44 really shines...you don't really need to do a traditional sound check per se, just be sure you have a clean feed into each channel. Who carers if the bass guitar is a little heavy...just re-mix in post. I just finished two weekends in a row with live bands and I got a superb capture with each with so little effort.

The only real check I do throughout the night is to see if the overload flag has illuminated for any channel...if so, I back off the channel a bit....

_________________________
Mark






Adam Forgione
Enthusiast

Oct 20, 2008, 4:50 PM

Post #6 of 6 (1007 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Mark Foley] thinking about getting the r44 [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To

Quote
my main concern is that you dont have time to get a proper sound check with the band and then you guess in manual, the reception starts and you have to run and gun it hoping it sounds good

This is where the R44 really shines...you don't really need to do a traditional sound check per se, just be sure you have a clean feed into each channel. Who carers if the bass guitar is a little heavy...just re-mix in post. I just finished two weekends in a row with live bands and I got a superb capture with each with so little effort.

The only real check I do throughout the night is to see if the overload flag has illuminated for any channel...if so, I back off the channel a bit....


i guess the best thing is buy this from BH and give it test drive. i can always return it, although im sure ill love it
Adam Forgione
Pennylane Productions