VideoUniversity.com
Home Free Library Store
Free Catalog

Please support VU by making your B&H purchases and links through this B&H ad. Doesn't cost a penny more. <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com?BI=603&KBID=1017"><IMG src="/images/flash_ads/videoUniv2_revised_conv.jpg" alt="B&H Photo" width="260" height="70"></a>
Video University Sponsor
Advertisement

See The New VU Postcard Catalog

To post in the forums see the Forum Guidelines.

Join or Renew Today.
New Benefits for all VU Members
Forum Guidelines and FAQ
Main Index Search Posts
Who's Online Log In


Home: Video University Forums: Digital Photography for Videographers:
extra lighting

 

 


Shadow
Veteran

Nov 17, 2006, 8:37 PM

Post #1 of 11 (754 views)
Shortcut
extra lighting Can't Post

I was going to get an extra light source for doing photos indoors, I had picked out something but the guy at the camera store told me what I needed was something that was $1000. I ended up leaving and not buying anything.

So, here's the question, do any of you use extra lighting when shooting portraits in a dark church?


Scott Brooks
Veteran

Nov 17, 2006, 10:43 PM

Post #2 of 11 (747 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Shadow] extra lighting [In reply to] Can't Post

No.

As a matter of fact they are sent a sheet that states I do not bring any additional lighting or backdrops of any kind.


Shadow
Veteran

Nov 17, 2006, 10:55 PM

Post #3 of 11 (745 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Sparky] extra lighting [In reply to] Can't Post

Do you find that your on-camera flash is good enough in dark locations so that you light up the background as well. For example, recently we were filming at a greenhouse after dark. They were standing in front of a waterfall but I wondered if they flash was going to get the waterfall or just the people.
does that make sense?
Forgive me if I am asking a stupid question.

H


Scott Brooks
Veteran

Nov 17, 2006, 11:04 PM

Post #4 of 11 (742 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Shadow] extra lighting [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
Do you find that your on-camera flash is good enough in dark locations so that you light up the background as well. For example, recently we were filming at a greenhouse after dark. They were standing in front of a waterfall but I wondered if they flash was going to get the waterfall or just the people.
does that make sense?
Forgive me if I am asking a stupid question.

H

It's going to depend on how much (if any) ambient light is there. For instance ... I've never shot outside at night with zero ambient light. Will a single flash illuminate the entire area? Doubt it.

The beauty of an IS lens is that you can shoot at a high ISO setting and slow shutter speed and allow additional (ambient) ambient light. You can do that with any lens, but the IS really helps for a steadier shot.

The problem you "might" have as well with your senerio is that the pre-flash hits the waterfall (waterfall possibly being reflective) and shuts down part of the flash if you're not in manual mode.

Flash is not my strongest area, but I'm getting much better.

When I added photography I decided I wasn't going to go through everything I did with video. If I was going to take stills then I was going to do it the way I wanted to and wasn't going to be forced into what others did. Therefore ... no lights with umbrellas, no brackets and no backdrops.


Brackish
Veteran


Nov 18, 2006, 1:23 AM

Post #5 of 11 (734 views)
Shortcut
Post deleted by Brackish [In reply to]

 


Scott Brooks
Veteran

Nov 18, 2006, 1:43 AM

Post #6 of 11 (727 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] extra lighting [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To

In Reply To
As a matter of fact they are sent a sheet that states I do not bring any additional lighting or backdrops of any kind.


Hey, Sparky. Why do you send this sheet?

It's part of the document about selecting formal poses.

My clients know that unless specifically requested the vast majority of my shots are candid in nature. I have a friend that sends out three pages of different groupings and events and has the client check what they want.

I send out a sheet with either 9 or 10 "suggested" photos. They can add more if they like.

The reason the statement is included is so there is absolutely NO miscommunication about what will and will not be done. My guess is that miscommunication in the service industry is at the top of the list for causing problems. I'm just doing this to cover my butt.

We have a couple of photographers in the area that spend a lot of time doing formals and bring in the entire studio. I'm sure that works for them. I will pass on a wedding before I do that.

I've attempted to cut and paste part of the document below. Hope it works.




Will your formals be before the ceremony, after the ceremony or both?______________
Depending on the weather and location … are you interested in doing all or part of your formals outside? Yes No

My style of photography is more journalistic and relaxed in nature. However, I realize that many couples still prefer to have a certain number of formals taken on their wedding day. Below is a list of suggested formals. Please understand that when budgeting your time you will need to allot 5 to 7 minutes for each grouping.

It is important for any and all family members to be included in the photos to be ready to go when the formals begin. We typically start with the larger groups and work our way down to the bride and groom. We will move as quickly as possible, so that you and your family can enjoy the reception.
We do not utilize any studio lighting or backdrops at the wedding site or the reception.
Please mark the photos that you wish to be taken. Also it is important to note any family situations that we may need to be made aware of. This should be reviewed two weeks prior to your wedding.

___Bride w/Bridesmaids ­­___Groom w/Groomsmen
___Couple w/both sets of parents ___Couple w/Bride’s parents
___Couple w/Bride’s immediate family ___Couple w/Groom’s parents
___Couple w/Groom’s immediate family ___Bride & Groom ___B&G w/Wedding Party ___Bride alone


Brackish
Veteran


Nov 18, 2006, 2:27 AM

Post #7 of 11 (724 views)
Shortcut
Post deleted by Brackish [In reply to]

 


Scott Brooks
Veteran

Nov 18, 2006, 2:42 AM

Post #8 of 11 (721 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] extra lighting [In reply to] Can't Post

Most couples choose a few more, but not much. 12 to 15 at the most with one exception ... I had one wedding where we had to do 60 groupings of formals.

We had to be out of the church in 30 minutes so we took quite a few on the steps outside the church. Then they just started gathering in the lobby of the reception hall for group photos. It sucked big time and the bride kept apologizing. I told her not to worry about it ... that we were fine. It was the MOG that wanted all the photos.

They were a fantastic couple, but I don't have as many great images of that wedding as I would have liked. Way too much time in the lobby.

If I ever am made aware of this in advance that this is what they want ... I'll probably refer them to someone else.

BTW ... I believe it was this particular wedding that I inserted the phrase about lighting and backdrops. I figured anyone wanting that many formals was going to expect a portrait setup.

I shouldn't complain too much ... they spent over three grand and gave me a tip.


Brackish
Veteran


Nov 18, 2006, 3:07 AM

Post #9 of 11 (720 views)
Shortcut
Post deleted by Brackish [In reply to]

 


Scott Brooks
Veteran

Nov 18, 2006, 3:13 AM

Post #10 of 11 (718 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] extra lighting [In reply to] Can't Post

When discussing with couples my approach I've yet to have one tell me they prefer someone more traditional. Even the massive one above ... the couple would have liked a lower-key approach ... they just got stuck with mom.

I would love to skip them all, but realistic enough to know that isn't going to happen. If nothing else you've got to get a few family shots in for the moms. Most brides seem to want to get to the reception and get the party going. Me too!


Jenn M
Veteran


Nov 18, 2006, 1:27 PM

Post #11 of 11 (689 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Sparky] extra lighting [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
The reason the statement is included is so there is absolutely NO miscommunication about what will and will not be done. My guess is that miscommunication in the service industry is at the top of the list for causing problems. I'm just doing this to cover my butt.



Sparky,

I like the way you think. You are soooo right. I'm very much the same way - nip it in the bud, I always say. It's the "can-do" guys ("I can do that. Sure, I can do that..." no matter what it is) and the ones who don't take the time to talk to their Client that have the most problems.

Maybe it comes from doing video for so many years and having to be on the ball and organized, planning ahead that we realize the importance of these things. I've worked with many a-photographer who tried to figure it out on the day of the wedding. Oh boy, what chaos. And they almost always end up missing basic formal shots, like the grandparents or something obvious.

I've only shot one full wedding on my own but I think I handled the formals pretty well, and this was with a bride that conjured up every possible variation of family and bridal party. She didn't have a full reception, so she wanted a lot of formals and she brought everybody to the park - from extended family to spouses of bridal party members. I knew the list of must-haves b/c I asked her this ahead of time. But one thing I did to minimize any anomosity towards me (b/c she had so many different combos and it was chilly and the bmaids were wearing sleeveless dresses) was my strategy of making her responsible. I would say, "Now, did you still want blah blah...?" And right on cue, she would say, "Oh yeah, hey you and you and you, get over here." So I basically left the dirty work up to her, calling people over and they grumbled at her instead of me. Wink

For the weddings I have booked next year (photo), I already had the formals discussion with them when we met, stressing the issues regarding time management. Basically saying what you put into writing, but it's a good idea to send it to them on paper closer to the wedding b/c we know how they tend to forget things. Also, I think many photogs tend to take waaaay more photos than they need. For example, one or two variations of the bridal party is sufficient - I've seen them do 4 or 5 and not only does it not go over well - it wastes time.

So far all the couples we've booked claim they don't want a lot of formals, but their parents weren't sitting in the room at the time. I'm no dummy - I know things change on the wedding day, but I think it's wise to employ the b&g in your strategy so they talk mom and dad down and so they remember when it comes time. One way to accomplish that is to address it in advance.

I, too, think it's wise to start large and work your way down to the b&g, b/c they often have the most stamina since it is their wedding, though you can lose grooms pretty quick. But at least the groom has the bride to contend with - so she'll get him in line. Then you can let the deadweight, I mean, the bridal party go do their thing. The only downside is you have to be diligent about the time management b/c you can run out of time pretty quickly and those b&g portraits are often the most important later and you don't want to run out of time and/or rush through them haphazardly. I've considered buying a watch with an alarm and setting it to go off 10 mins before I know we have to leave - to make sure there is enough time for the couple. It's easy to lose track of time when you have 2 sets of family coming at your with requests.

As far as backdrops and lighting... we're making a conscious effort to not get too involved in supplimental equipment, though that could change, I suppose. With photo, I want to travel light. I don't see many photogs setting up lights anymore. Maybe one flash on a pole, but that's about it. There's just no time. It's more likely to happen in the winter months, b/c they can't shoot outside. But I would much rather use the time to take photos rather than setting up for one. That's how I plan to address it.

It's funny b/c several photogs turned to me, exasperated at a wedding (after they knew we were going to start offering photography) and said, "See what you're going to have to deal with?"

I just laughed and said, "If this is the hardest part of your day, I'll take it."

They've never had to mic a groom, an officiant and a podium with 5 minutes to spare and no cooperation, and so on...