
DarrenS
Veteran
Jan 30, 2007, 10:53 AM
Post #6 of 14
(818 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [Shadow] rates for commercial work
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Rusty is dead on (again). It likely sounds high compared to what we've done in video, however, you don't get to keep the whole g-note for yourself! Plus most videographers are part-time. I'm not going to touch on the whole 'video is easier than photo or vis-versa' issue. Someone will shoot me But I'm assuming he's running a full time business. I lop 25% for income taxes right off the hop, asset depreciation, pro services like accountant/legal, your operating and overhead costs like gear/liability insurance, interest (esp. if you borrowed to startup), Internet/phone/fax, pc software/hardware upgrades, rent, utilities, loan payments, advertising, association/club dues, light bulbs, salaries including your own, batteries, time spent on research/post shoot processing, etc, etc, etc. Overhead/Operating costs KILL most small business owners. They never account or even consider how much all those tiny little costs add up. They either outright fizzle out and die, or end up making $15/hr. I'd rather go work for someone else if I'm getting $15/hr and let them get gray hair from running a business. Personally (not to sound greedy or anything) I think a talented photographer, esp. one that can make nice pictures of building interiors, is worth her weight in gold. Sounds like his clients do too if they're bringing a shooter in from hours away. These people want it done right. Those pictures must be dazzleing, not flat snapshots that any chooch could make with a SLR and strobe. Buildings have lots of straight lines that must be kept straight. Cheap zooms are going to have complex distortion photoshop simply can't fix. A shift lens or high quality wide prime. Lighting is another huge issue. It's hard, and pretty expensive too. I'd rather shoot people/weddings. Way easier. edit: sorry my spelling sucks
(This post was edited by DarrenS on Jan 30, 2007, 11:58 AM)
|