
X-jim_colman
Imported Account
Jun 11, 2004, 7:05 PM
Post #4 of 7
(1573 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: CHEAP Alternative Sound Methods
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
: Thanks Jim. : $500 is a bit steep for me, expecially on a day to day basis. : This is my first flick, and I want to get my hands wet in filmmakeing as I am still in high school and look to make a career in film, so, I want to make a good piece, yet focus more on the story and character development, and not have the audience focus on the mistakes of an amature. I have access to mics that you would see a speaker use, the ones that just attach to the person on their shirt or something, otherwise, I am shot for ideas. I was wondering if there was any cheaper alternatives, like a large mic that I can use to cover a large area so all the people talking will be heard evenly. Know what I mean? : As I said, this is my first flick, and I want to focus on it and do a great job by eliminating amature mistakes and make it seem like a more professional film. Thanks so much. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks again. : Brian. I hear ya Brian. I was in your shoes myself a long time ago. There isn't a cheap mic that will do what you want. There are good mics that you can attach to a fishpole and capture audio from a ways away, but they're not cheap. The mics you have acces to are laviliers and will work fine, except that you still need a mixer (and audio person) if you're using more than one mic (two if you have duel mic inputs on your camera) The other problem with lav's is that they're hard wired and you have to hide the wires. I suggest that you shoot your scenes all in close ups and medium shots first, then back the camera up and shoot your wide shots. Take the audio from the close ups (which your camera mic should pick up) and sync it up to your wide shot. You'll be able to stay in sync (assuming your talent is half-way decent) long enough that the audience won't notice anything unusual. Don't linger too long on the wide shots and you'll be fine. Besides, creating a scene with editing is often more effective than staying on a long wide shot. Jim
|