VideoUniversity.com
Home Free Library Store
Free Catalog

Please support VU by making your B&H purchases and links through this B&H ad. Doesn't cost a penny more. <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com?BI=603&KBID=1017"><IMG src="/images/flash_ads/videoUniv2_revised_conv.jpg" alt="B&H Photo" width="260" height="70"></a>
Video University Sponsor
Advertisement

See The New VU Postcard Catalog

To post in the forums see the Forum Guidelines.

Join or Renew Today.
New Benefits for all VU Members
Forum Guidelines and FAQ
Main Index Search Posts
Who's Online Log In



Home: Video University Forums: HDV:
FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen

 

 


Godfrey
User

Feb 23, 2007, 4:56 AM

Post #1 of 8 (995 views)
Shortcut
FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen Can't Post

Unsure Have taken the plunge with HDV using both FX1 and HC1.

Converting HDV to SD the image on NLE looks good and it all behaves as normal with Ulead Workshop2 but, as with our VX2100s in 16:9 , the images on a flat screen from the dvd looks very blurred but not on the crt

We took our samples to the local flat screen dealer. He kindly ran the sample dvd on both plasmas and lcds where the image was only marginally better.

It occurs to us that maybe the encoder in Workshop 2 is not upto scratch for these flat screens and what we should be doing is burningto a file and then encoding in a third party software like TMPG or PROCODER.

Do you use separate encoders from your authoring programmes and if so which ones do you find most appropriate for flat screens?

.


David L
User


Feb 23, 2007, 3:04 PM

Post #2 of 8 (979 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Godfrey] FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen [In reply to] Can't Post

Godfrey: I haven't yet created DVDs from HDV downconverted to DV yet, but I have created widescreen DVDs from 16:9 SD DV footage from the FX1. I found that my usual encoder, the Canopus hardware encoder, which was great with 4:3 SD footage, did a terrible job with 16:9 footage, making the footage look very soft and even slightly distorted; so I switched to the Procoder Express (only $60 or so) and it did a great job. So it seems to me from this experience that some encoders do a better job with 16:9 than others. Don't know why, I suspect it has something to do with field order.

Also, note that SD material on an LCD screen generally doesn't look as good as the same material on CRT's. I don't think there's much that can be done about that.


(This post was edited by David L on Feb 23, 2007, 3:06 PM)


okspyder
User


Feb 23, 2007, 3:46 PM

Post #3 of 8 (970 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Godfrey] FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen [In reply to] Can't Post

I am no expert but I think your problem is viewing SD footage on a HD TV. I have yet to see SD on a flat screen hd tv that looks great.

Anthony


Godfrey
User

Feb 25, 2007, 10:11 AM

Post #4 of 8 (933 views)
Shortcut
Re: [David L] FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen [In reply to] Can't Post

Hi David.

At which part of your Workflow are you using Procoder Express? Do you Author first and save to file then encode or encode BEFORE before you author?


David L
User


Feb 25, 2007, 3:35 PM

Post #5 of 8 (923 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Godfrey] FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen [In reply to] Can't Post

I use Procoder Express to create an mpeg file from the Premiere timeline. I also export as a separate file the audio from the Premiere timeline. I then import the mpeg and .wav files into DVD Workshop, and author the disc.


Godfrey
User

Feb 27, 2007, 6:35 PM

Post #6 of 8 (896 views)
Shortcut
Re: [David L] FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen [In reply to] Can't Post

Thanks. Will try it


Godfrey
User

Feb 27, 2007, 6:39 PM

Post #7 of 8 (893 views)
Shortcut
Re: [David L] FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen [In reply to] Can't Post

Just an afterthought. Why not allow Procoder to encode both video and audio files for import to Workshop 2 rather than split them? Surely this would be a simpler workflow and avoid potential out of sync problems?


David L
User


Feb 27, 2007, 7:18 PM

Post #8 of 8 (891 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Godfrey] FX1 AND HC1 on an lcd screen [In reply to] Can't Post

I can't remember the exact rationale for splitting the audio and video, I think it has something to do with some DVD players having trouble playing "program" files (the video and audio together), so the general rule of thumb is to split the video mpeg from the audio .wav file to ensure compatibility.