
videobear
Veteran

Feb 28, 2005, 1:11 PM
Post #11 of 18
(3234 views)
Shortcut
|
Toni, It's a very tough call as to whether to go HDV or DV at this point. There are strong arguments for both sides, and I can't advise you on which route would be better. Here are some points to think about, though: In favor of DV... - Lower cost - Wide selection of equipment and software - Well-understood production and delivery chain In favor of HDV... - Better picture quality (there are some caveats to this, depending on whether you shoot HDV and downconvert, or shoot DV in the camera). Picture quality is definitely better IF you can stay in HDV all the way and view the results on an HDTV monitor. - Native widescreen format. - May well be the "wave of the future", but this is not yet certain. Even if it is, remember that early adopters of DV had to wait two years before the first all-DV editing solution became available. Some negatives regarding HDV... - Higher cost of equipment and media. (Tape cost is about $14.00, vs. $5.00 for a DV cassette). - Requires a VERY powerful computer and a VERY large fast disk array to edit native HDV (dual 3.06 GHz Xeon, 1 terabyte or more of storage for ONE wedding project). - There are "startup glitches" in the production chain. It may take some hair-pulling until the bugs are worked out between vendors and within individual products. - There is not yet a widespread delivery medium (you need clients with HDTVs and, preferably, D-VHS tape machines to provide the best results). - The Sony HDV cams have a poorer low light spec than the VX2100 or PD-170. However, many users claim the lack of grain and the increased color resolution of the HDV units offsets this. - Because HDV files are recorded as MPEG-2, digital dropouts may be longer-lasting. This may make it more advisable to use a hard-disk recorder with this format. I expect that HDV will continue to gain support from the hardware and software manufacturers, but you do have to live through the rocky startup period if you elect to go the HDV route today. Regards, Doug Graham Panda Productions
|