
RatVega
Enthusiast

Dec 2, 2005, 2:01 PM
Post #2 of 4
(761 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [eagle26] FCP - Motion Question
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
You don't have much here about the specific environment (RT timeline, rendered timeline, whatever) so I'll guess you're in an RT timeline. I can tell you that unless you have a very hefty Mac, it's likely that the problem is that the Motion sequence us using a lot of bandwidth, forcing the DV into a low quality proxy. Completely render the timeline (including audio mixdown) and see if that helps. If you've done that already, you have the option of rendering the Motion sequence separately and creating a QT movie, then importing that clip into FCP. This will dramatically decrease the overhead and should make everything play nicely after rendering the timeline. Motion is a wonderful application, but it really uses up your system. It likes lots of processor power, lots of RAM, lots of fast disk, and all the video board you can afford to throw at it. It's not amazing that there's no direct equivalent for a PC. Running a "live" Motion sequence in the FCP timeline is asking a lot unless your system is way fast. I'm considering going to an X800 board to increase my Motion performance... BTW, all these problems should vanish when the footage is exported for transcoding. The .mov you export should play nicely in QT Viewer. ______________________________________________________________ Currently on a loaded 2.5GHz G5 dualie/5GB/1TB internal RAID/dual 19" monitors. Final Cut Studio, Adobe Suite, Boris RED. Shooting with Canon. VU California Crew, Inland Empire Sub-Chapter (paragraph?)
|