VideoUniversity.com
Home Free Library Store
Free Catalog

Please support VU by making your B&H purchases and links through this B&H ad. Doesn't cost a penny more. <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com?BI=603&KBID=1017"><IMG src="/images/flash_ads/videoUniv2_revised_conv.jpg" alt="B&H Photo" width="260" height="70"></a>
Video University Sponsor
Advertisement

See The New VU Postcard Catalog

To post in the forums see the Forum Guidelines.

Join or Renew Today.
New Benefits for all VU Members
Forum Guidelines and FAQ
Main Index Search Posts
Who's Online Log In


Home: Inactive Forums: Underwater Video:
newbie: video lighting - HiD vs. Others

 

 


buviman
New User

Oct 7, 2004, 5:54 AM

Post #1 of 4 (2033 views)
Shortcut
newbie: video lighting - HiD vs. Others Can't Post

Hi All;

Can you kindly extend your patience to this post?

I am confused about HiD lighting vs. other types:

some say that higher temperatures (~6000K) approximates sunlight and gives better results
others that you should stay around 5000K, and HiD is to bright.

also, HiD apparently has longer burn time / tends to have much smaller/cheaper battery packs...

any recommendations either way?
any specific product recommendations?

I have only really checked out one set - the NiteRider pro.

thanks again

bm


sailordiver
Novice

Nov 14, 2004, 12:39 PM

Post #2 of 4 (1843 views)
Shortcut
Re: [buviman] newbie: video lighting - HiD vs. Others [In reply to] Can't Post

HiD is far better than quartz because of the color temp. difference. Orange everything gets tiresome to the eye and is inaccurate anyway. I use a pair of Halcyon 50W HiDs and a pair of DiveRite 21W HiDs. Both work great. The Halcyons are in the 5000 deg.K range and the DiveRites are cooler at about 6000 deg.K. Good Luck.


CamDiver
Novice


Nov 22, 2004, 5:32 PM

Post #3 of 4 (1761 views)
Shortcut
Re: [buviman] newbie: video lighting - HiD vs. Others [In reply to] Can't Post

Hi,
HID in my book is over rated. I use lighting from Fa-Mi (www.fa-mi.com) their lighting systems are more than adequate for close work. I pretty much specialise in Macro and so this is an important aspect of my work. Macro with diopter lenses, up to +10 at times.

For anything else I use wide lenses and no lighting. It all comes down to how you set up the camera.

Cheers,
mark.
Palau
Western Pacific
(someone's gotta live here, right?)


bubblevision
Novice


Dec 30, 2004, 2:22 AM

Post #4 of 4 (1458 views)
Shortcut
Re: [buviman] newbie: video lighting - HiD vs. Others [In reply to] Can't Post

My Sony VX2000 is very good in low light so I don't use lights often during the daytime, only if I'm really deep or in caves etc.. I use L&M Sunray halogens at night. I tend to search for the fish on the middle of 3 power settings and then switch to the dimmest setting for the actual shooting so the fish don't get stressed out and the image doesn't get blown out. I can't imagine doing close work underwater at night with HID. They'd just be too bright. For daytime though, they can be very useful fillers if that's your style and of course he burn time is way longer than halogen.
_________________________________________
Bubble Vision underwater video & marine life DVD, Phuket, Thailand
Sony VX2000, Gates housing, L&M Sunray lights
Sony Vegas