Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Email Address:
* Required

First Name:

Last Name:

Subscribe

Unsubscribe


Satisfied Customers

I was lucky to stumble upon a mentor who distills years of learning and hard-won successes that even a neophyte can put into practice. Hal Landen's course is well worth every penny.

Steve Sakellarios

Accolades

Forbes Magazine calls VideoUniversity one of the best business-to-business sites for digital video production.


Forbes Magazine Award


Winner... Videography Magazine's "Website of the Month" Award


Winner... PC Magazine Online "Best Desktop Video Site" Award


Winner... CyberFilm School's "FOUR STAR" Award

Search For Video Gear on Amazon

Ebay Search Camcorders DSLRs and More

May 15

REVIEW: Litepanel’s Micro LED light

By: Anthony Burokas

 

The compact Micro from Litepanels.

I had the opportunity to try out the Litepanels Micro on top of a Panansonic prosumer HD camcorder. After using budget LED lights from Amazon for some time, I was looking forward to how well the Litepanels LED light would “step up my game” by being a well, thought out professional tool, and not an LED light selected solely on price from Amazon or Ebay.

When I pulled it out of the box, I was surprised at the small size of the unit. Just about 3″ wide, 1.5″ thick and a little more than 3″ tall, not including the shoe mount adapter. It’s also only 4 oz until you put the batteries in. These batteries gave me a couple hours of use, and it was pretty heavy use as I was doing live IMAG on the high school prom floor, so it was on pretty much the whole time. Then it started to noticeably dim and I had to swap out for a fresh set of 4 AA batteries which finished the night.

Just 4 AA's power the Litepanels Micro

I was a little disappointed by the cold shoe adapter, which has been reworked in the current model, as I found it not able to really be locked into place. As tight as I could make it, a slight bump with my arm pushed the light askew.

The light weight cold shoe mount.

But during normal use, the light would stay where I put it. Turning or tipping the camera did not movie the light so if I didn’t bump it, the light was fine. This mount was just enough to hold the LED light.

The 48 LED array on the front.

The Micro features 48 LEDs with a cool 5600k color balance. This means that outdoor use is correct and indoor use requires a filter. The Micro kit comes with two different tungsten filters to correct for indoor light, which I have in place here. The filters are thin pieces of stiff gel that you bend into place and then they fit into tiny slots on the face of the light and are held flat against the plastic surface over the LEDs. This works well in practice, but changing gels takes a bit of time. Adding & subtracting the frosted gel to try and widen the beam spread was too annoying to repeat, so I left it in place.

Speaking of the beam spread, let’s just say that the Litepanels Micro should be considered a “spot” light.

The "spot" beam spread of the Litepanels Micro LED light

Even with the mostly ineffectual frost in front of the LED light, the beam spread was only for the center of my image when the lens was wide. If I zoomed in half way, then the beam spread of the LED filled the frame. Good for more distant work, but not good for wide, close work, or widescreen HD cameras with more space to the sides. I was very disappointed that it wasn’t more even, and that the frosted gel didn’t have a more dramatic effect on the spread of the light.

Small and compact does the job.

On the camera, the light’s small size and light weight were bonuses. I hardly felt the extra weight when using the camera, and it didn’t stick up that high. The dimmer on top allowed me to dim down the camera when people were getting very close, but also, considering the event, the camera’s auto iris also closed down, dropped the gain and the extra light was actually beneficial to the image.

At a distance, the Micro does the job.

At a distance, the Litepanels Micro does the job, illuminating the subject in the center of the frame and providing a well lit image. If you need a wider spread, you’ll need to augment your filter package with more diffusion.

As for the price, it currently runs for about $275. This is about 4x more than my cheap LED light, which I actually like better. So do you get what you pay for when stepping up to a “name” brand in professional lights? In my humble opinion, not in this case. For $275, you get a small, and light fixture, but one that dies in a couple hours. For under $100, my budget LED runs off a camcorder battery for longer, has more LEDs, a wider natural beam spread, and more effective filters with magnets that let me pop them on and off with ease.

More on this budget light in my next review.

 

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Apr 06

Ditch Final Cut Pro, But Keep QuickTime Pro

By: Anthony Burokas
 

One of the “givens” that Final Cut Pro users take for granted is the incredible capability of QuickTime Player Pro. Not only can this “player” record video in SD and HD from external and internal cameras, but it makes many repetitive video tasks extremely quick. Ditching Final Cut Studio in a clean sweep can remove the “Pro” features from QuickTime Player. Here’s how to get them back.

When I decided to make the move away from Final Cut Studio (and Final Cut Pro) I also took that time to completely upgrade my existing laptop with a Solid State Disk (SSD) and perform a clean install of the OS (from an optical disk no less!) and a clean install of Adobe Creative Suite 5. (CS5). Everything became quite snappy on this “new” laptop and I quickly became busy learning the ropes in Premiere. I upgraded an existing machine, but this also applies if you are making the jump to a new machine.

But, of course, I still have clients who need existing projects worked on, updated, tweaked, etc. For one client, I was in the midst of putting their finished video on YouTube for rental. I needed to grab 30 seconds of this video from the finished, stand-alone, rendered movie and make a new clip which I would upload separately and then link it as the preview file for the rental.

I went to my default tool, QuickTime Player and was flumoxed by the fact that I couldn’t set an in and out point to copy a portion of the clip. And then I realized what the problem was: the “Pro” part of QuickTime Player requires a separate $20 purchase from Apple to be activated. Using FCP for over 10 years meant that I never needed to buy QuickTime Pro separately. But now, leaving FCP behind, those QuickTime Pro features were no longer available to me. I needed to find another way to make excerpts quickly.

Selecting an excerpt in QuickTime Player Pro

Selecting an excerpt in QuickTime Player Pro

In Premiere, I imported the source clip. Opened it in the viewer. Set my in and out points and couldn’t figure out how to export the clip from the viewer. So I dragged the whole thing into the timeline and then cut it down. Time to export. I really just wanted to copy what I had into a new file. No transcoding or anything. Then, I faced Premiere’s daunting Export module and was immediately flumoxed by the fact that I didn’t see “use current settings” anywhere. It wanted me to either pick one of the presets or create a new setting from scratch. This was getting much more complicated than I wanted to deal with.

I wanted my QuickTime Player Pro back.

I asked fellow professionals for help, and of course I was told that Premiere can do anything, that Vegas could handle this. Edius has no problem… but most of them missed the point. I wanted something fast and simple. On a Mac, especially one now with a speedy SSD in it, QuickTime Player opens and plays a clip in under a second. Creating an excerpt takes just 7 keystrokes:

  • Double click the file, click spacebar to play,
  • Type “i“, type “o“, Copy, New, Paste, Save, type a name, Enter
  • Wait a moment, then Quit.

QuickTime Player defaults to saving the file as a “self-contained movie.” Doing this copies only the data between the In and Out points of your source movie into a new file. In the Finder, it literally does just COPY the footage from one file to the other. No transcoding. No export settings. It’s nearly as simple as selecting “Duplicate” in the Finder, except QuickTime Player Pro enables me to pick what portion of the source file to duplicate. This is why QuickTime Player Pro had become essential to an expedient workflow on my computer.

But how do I get QuickTime Pro back?

The answer lies in the registration file for Final Cut Studio that QuickTime Player checks to activate the Pro features of the app. This registration is nestled on the hard drive in a logical place, and just needs to be copied from the old hard drive to the same place on the new one.

This is where you find the ProApps folder. Or where you put it if you need to make one.

Starting from the root level of the drive > Library > Application Support > ProApps Look for the “Final Cut Studio System ID.” That’s what you need to copy. On your new hard drive, go to the same place, and create the ProApps folder if you need to. Drag “Final Cut Studio System ID” from the old ProApps folder to the new one. Done.

Copy this one file from your old system to keep QuickTime Player Pro features.

The next time you launch QuickTime Player, you’ll have full access to every feature it has.

Don’t be confused by the Final Cut Express files I have in my new ProApps folder. I have a client who requires that we swap project files back and forth so I am still using Final Cut Express for them. But installing Final Cut Express actually does NOT enable QuickTime Pro. So, I still needed to install QuickTime Pro separately.

If you aren’t cleaning out your System and Library folders, or using an application to remove all vestiges of Final Cut Studio (which spreads itself out into many different locations) then you probably will end up keeping the ProApps folder and QuickTime Player will continue to see your registration. But should you ever need to upgrade your hard drive, or move to a new Mac, and you’re not going to reinstall the old Final Cut Studio… you’ll want that one little file to keep the QuickTime Pro you’ve become accustomed to using.
.

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Mar 22

Live Events with the New iPad 3

By: Anthony Burokas

Apple’s New iPad 3 is making quite a splash. Several key features really play out to the benefit of media producers for whom ultra-fast turnaround is paramount. With the latest processing horsepower and the latest version of iOS iMovie I think a lot of computers are going to be left collecting dust with this.

The new lens touts many advancements for stellar images.

The New iPad (they’re not calling it iPad 3, for no fathomable reason) is all around better. Better lens. Lots more megapixels. Image stabilized HD video. Faster A5X chip. So it’ll be able to handle shooting video with ease, “zooming” with your feet (by walking closer) of course.

Massive resolution in a small 10" screen.

Then you can look at your video with the massively increased resolution of the new “Retina” display. Now it’s well over full HD resolution. So get some bifocals or reading glasses and get closer to the action because there’s tons of resolution in this little 10″ screen.

iMovie Editing with themes for quick, polished looking and sounding videos.

Then we get to the new iMovie for The New iPad and you can use themes to “wrap” your video and provide “a cinematic soundtrack” to go from raw clips to a polished presentation much faster and easier than ever before. The increased processing horsepower of the iPad will again come into play here for any effects you add to your video- and there are lots of effects in the new imovie so you can make it look quite different than what you started with.

The new iMovie is also available for iPod Touch and iPhone, so those users can get in on the act here as well.

Te AppleTV enables wireless playback of your videos for everyone to see.

Lastly, the AppleTV, which is still just a stand-alone product, now operates more like a wireless playback accessory for the iPad. You can connect this to any projector or TV at the event and wirelessly send your finished video from the iPad (or other iOS device) to the AppleTV and deliver it to your customers without ever having to move it from the camera.

As an added bonus, the new 4G LTE lets you also push it to online video services with record speed, so everyone attending can watch it again, or share your video with others. And in this age of social media, being shared is very good business indeed.

Do this a couple times and the hardware has literally paid for itself.

 

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Mar 13

Encouraging the “Unplugged Event”

By: Anthony Burokas
Photo by Jodi Miller Photography

A notice at a recent event. Photo by Jodi Miller Photography

Do you take this woman to be your… WHO LET THE DOGS OUT, RUFF, RUFF.

Cell phones, cameras and other devices can absolutely ruin a wedding ceremony. So the policy that all phones, cameras are other devices must be turned off for the wedding ceremony is a growing trend. The only ones who are exempt are those who are hired to record the event.

In all my years of video taping Jewish events in the Temple, I never saw the same usage of still cameras as I see in churches, or in ceremonies held outside of religious houses. Temples have very clear rules about the use of electronics and it really keeps everyone (okay, maybe not the 13 year old kids so much) focussed on the ceremony and the family. This is good.

I agree with the sentiment of Unplugged Weddings, especially after being forced to set up my camera gear at the rear of a church because of a “no photography” policy. A policy that all the attendees completely ignored during the service. They even went so far as to walk up around the alter area to take pictures with their (then) cruddy camera flip phones. This was long before the amazing capability of today’s technology.

Nowadays, nearly every cell phone can shoot decent photos, and full HD video. I’ve done events with 15 year old Cousin Billy standing next to me, shadowing my every move, and using my camera light to provide good video for his point-n-shoot still camera. You know he’s going to make a video of it and show off his good work- his lighting, his framing, his years of experience as to when to be where to get the good shot. Etc. That’s to be expected, here and there, but it’s a growing trend, more and more, every day.

From Offbeat Bride – Photo by Nora and Troy at Aurora-Photography

The photographer, Jessica Charles, includes a letter from a bride that goes on to give the reasons why, including the fact that the ceremony at the aquarium would be held in front of a floor-to-ceiling fish tank.

Fish tanks do not make for good flash photo backgrounds.

A nice and attentive crowd- not distracted by trying to take their own pictures or video.

We got married in front of a giant fish tank in low lighting and we knew that most people would not think and use their flash. That would cause a reflection off the tank, thus ruining the professional pictures we were paying for… even if we had picked a different venue, our decision would still be the same. For me, it was about respect for my photographers. We also chose this because because we wanted our guests to emerge from behind their electronics and be fully present in the moment with us.

So in talking about upcoming events with your clients, suggest going “Unplugged.” Even if it is corporate. The same rules apply. It certainly can’t hurt to bring it into the conversation- it costs nothing. But the benefits it can bring are great: keeping the attention of those attending, removing distractions.

For us, it removes competition- and obstacles like the nitwit who invariably stands right in front of my camera because that’s where the good shot is. But it also enables us to give our customers a better product.

 

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Mar 02

What the Canon 5DmkIII Means To Me

By: Anthony Burokas

 

It’s finally here- the successor to the full-frame DSLR that sparked the entire Video-DSLR revolution (or upheaval as many called it.) On Friday, March 2nd, Canon announced the 5D MarkIII with several notable improvements. But do these make this camera another game changer, or do they just refine what the 5D is in the market?

The Full Frame 5D is back for more in "Mark III"

Truth be told, that as the vDSLR movement grew and successors to the 5D came out, the competitive advantages of the 5D became less and less. Especially in recent months with the release of Nikon’s D4 and D800 series cameras. But the 5DmkIII brings Canon right back up to the bar in terms of capability. So “Cannonites” need not start to consider trying to jump ship to Nikon.

Several key features for videographers stand out:

  • New sensor with 2-more stops of light gathering. Better for low light work. Better to let you close down a lens to get a deeper depth of field and keep focus easier. Reportedly smoother images.
  • New DIGIC 5+ processor. Reportedly greatly diminishes the problematic moire and aliasing that plagues the 5DmkII.
  • New compression choices. Including “All-I” frame compression where each frame is compressed individually- making for much easier editing because a given frame does not have to first decode the frames around it to be seen.
  • Longer recording time. Now you can record up to 30 minutes (instead of 12 minutes on the mkII) and the camera will automatically break the video into 4 GB chunks on a FAT-32 formatted card, a process called “spanning.”
  • A headphone jack. Now you can monitor the actual audio the camera is recording. Coupled with this…
  • Better audio control while recording. 64 levels- adjustable before and during recording. Together, these two features greatly lessen the need for an external audio recorder for many projects.
  • Better LCD screen. If you want to travel light (without an outboard monitor) the improved screen will help.
  • HDMI out no longer drops resolution to SD when recording.

A headphone jack and better audio controls are notable improvements.

But several caveats still remain:

  • No clean HDMI out. If you don’t use an external recorder, this isn’t an issue.
  • Moire & aliasing. The PR says “significantly reducing” moire and color artifacts. It doesn’t say it has eliminated them.
  • The 60 fps video is only 720p, finally reaching what HD camcorders have been doing for many years. This is still less than the new AVCHD spec of 1080p60.
  • Timecode capability. It’s finally there, but given that so many workarounds already exist, it’s not much needed any more.
  • CMOS “jello” remains. It’s a large sensor with lots of pixels so refreshing it faster is still a very hard thing to do.
  • No “crop” modes like Nikon / Panasonic Lumix. These help with using different lenses and also let one lens act as two or three.
  • It’s $3,500 without glass. So, if you really need that shallow depth of field, it’s a choice, but now you are clearly approaching the same cost of real, large sensor, video cameras. If the cost is the same, choose a video camera to do a video camera’s job.

Some improvements, but not a "game changer" because the game has changed around it.

If you are already heavily set up for 5D video, then swapping out the body and getting the new benefits is a no-brainer. If you are new to vDSLR work, then strongly consider a large-sensor camcorder- purpose built for shooting video, as opposed to a vDSLR.

 

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Feb 24

Get Free Marketing and PR on TV, Print, & more.

 

By: Anthony Burokas

When it comes to getting exposure for your company, you can buy print ads, buy online ads, buy postcards & mailers, buy a table at a local event show, and after a while, you will see people start to get to know you and your brand. But what if you could leverage the power and reach of local TV airtime without having to pay for it? That would be pretty darn valuable.

Video University regular Bill Grant recently posted about his Tie The Knot Tips videos in the Video University Forums (membership required). I took a few minutes to speak with him about how he started the video series, what the return on his investment is, and how others can start doing the same thing in their local market.

First, let’s take a look at one of his segments:

Now, you’ll note that not only does he not specifically promote himself and his company as producers of the video segment, he includes his competitors. Other segments about Florists, Photographers, Catering, Staging, etc do not have any reference to Bill Grant or his company Cinema Coture at all.

So what’s the premise and how does it pay off?

It all started when Bill wanted to develop a closer networking relationship with a local event planner that targeted the same high level of clients that CinemaCoture served. A local agency guy that Bill had worked  before was now an anchor on the local morning news show. Seeing an opportunity to connect the dots, Bill approached the planner with the basic concept of a “tips” show for brides. Once she was on board, Bill approached his contact at the station.

Tying The Knot Tips host Melanie Murphy.

The key motivations for the station are: they have a 3-4 hour morning show that they have to fill with entertaining and useful content for their viewers. Offering them something like a bridal tips video package – for free – gives them great content that they can use without any additional cost. It is easier to get your video accepted by the station in smaller markets, than in larger ones, like LA, NYC, etc. Also, it really helps to have a polished package- front to back, audio, music, title & closing bumpers, etc. But don’t put lower 3rd graphics on the people- the station will want to do that so the titles are uniform with the rest of the show.

Bill worked out an initial 10 ideas with the wedding planner and proceeded to make calls to local vendors in each of these categories to have them offer advice to brides. These are typically shot at the Planner’s studio, but Bill also visits other vendors who are too pressed for time to come in to the studio. For each segment, Bill says it typically takes about an hour to shoot, and then an hour to cut and post the segment. Then he can upload a 720p MPEG-2 file directly to the station’s FTP server and they take it from there.

Return On Investment:
How has this paid off? Bill says that his bookings and referrals are up. Now, it’s hard to say whether this is due specifically due to the video series, or other economic and industry factors, but he hopes it continues. One thing that has definitely increased is his connection with event vendors. After each episode that airs, many vendors that weren’t interviewed for the segment call in and ask why not, and how they can be involved in the future. So people are indeed watching, and vendors in industry are more aware of Cinema Coture now than before the video segments started airing.

If I feature two caterers or two florists in a show then every other florist feels “well, why not me?” It’s been an interesting situation we’ve created. We’ve basically set up a thing that the vendors want to get involved in. It’s a side-effect that we didn’t necessarily intend.

Other returns on the investment are less tangible. It’s promoting the value of video in general and provides an information service which is likely to grow mindshare over time. It could be parlayed into new business through local Chambers of Commerce- showing how local businesses are using video to tell their story. But the primary benefit is for the industry that Tie The Knot Tips serves:

I think our industry as a whole lacks a validity in the bride’s eyes so if you connect what we do- like short form- with all those necessary vendors out there, we become one of those … with the associations that we have with them, we’re now in the conversation. And that helps the visibility of what we do. I think a lot of brides don’t want the “old style” video. They want something new and stylish that matches up with their photography and what type of event they’re planning to do. If they can see videographers associated with these other categories, it puts us in the same mind. 

A polished, animated open and close really help to sell the segment.

Make the package complete, and polished, so the stations can easily air it.

Moving Forward:

The video segments will continue on the TV station. But now there are plans to extend the information to other media. Local newspapers, especially free ones, are always looking for useful, local, and free content. Taking the information from the video and converting it to text, and editing it so it flows, creates a useful article that reaches a whole new market. Lastly, the videos will reside on a new TieTheKnotTips.com blog that will also include other information for brides. “There’s no end to what’s possible if you understand how to take advantage of local markets.” But don’t stop there. What about reaching out beyond your city, region, state… out to the country, and even beyond:

All of these options are out there. The tips are universal- we made sure of that, in case we wanted to do a national blog or show, we weren’t going to localize it too much. That possibility is certainly out there and, of course, there’s no reason to start a project like this without thinking as big as you can. And shoot for as big as you can go and see how far you can take it. 

Every local market has several network stations. If they have a big local morning news show, they need content. Produce one segment as a test-bed, sample and make it available online. Call in to the station manager and talk to a producer about supplying a segment like this. Send them an e-mail with a link to your sample. Make it clean and easy for the station to pick up and use with minimal effort on their side. If they want it, then you have the commitment for distribution. Getting local vendors involved is generally pretty easy because they all would welcome some free air time on local TV.

 

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Feb 15

Back Up Early & Often
posted in: Anthony Burokas

By: Anthony Burokas

Soon, 100 MBps for flash media will be "slow"

We live in a “fast” society. I laugh every time I see the new AT&T 4G LTE ads on television with the two guys at the football game- who are so far ahead of everyone else because of their super-fast mobile broadband… “you guys know how to post VIDEOS to Facebook?” That’s soooo 23 seconds ago.

Flash media now rules the roost with digital cameras. We want edit systems with native file handling, no transcoding, accelerated H.264 compression and megafast upload speeds for delivery.

But what do we archive all our media?

Drive connect standards seem to change every couple years, SCSI, then IDE, then ATA, then SATA. Did you save a backup of your source files onto external Syquest or Bernoulli drives? Then 1.4 MB “floppy?” Then super huge (at the time) Zip drive? Then Jazz drive? Then to external CD-R disks? Then DVD-R disks? … It used to be that you could save the camera tapes for the original footage, but in the age of flash media, the cards get reused quickly. Nobody is going to put a $650 64GB P2 card on the shelf as an archive. The footage moves down the chain like water down the stream. But where does it end up? Where do you put it to archive it?

This tape, from 30 years ago, still plays fine.

I recently had an exchange with a fellow producer and he related this story to me:

My 31 year old 1″ type C played fine a couple of months ago on my $113 BVH 3000. I was surprised how good it looked.

Now, I’ll try to spring for a different break out box for my client’s aja card that allows for composite in. Will transfer it to a hard drive. The footage was from a stillborn doc. Might be able to sell it to the principals in it for their use.

Do you trust optical media for your archives? I don't.

I have DVD-R disks that were unplayable in less than 5 years. Fellow producers were hampered by CD-Rs that were unreadable in less than 10 years. Hard disk drive interfaces change regularly. What format will you store your media on so it plays back in 30 years? The answer is that you have to keep moving it forward & updating it. It is an ongoing process, not something you set & forget.

I have a special interest video series where the music was composed in Mark of the Unicorn’s “Performer” and saved on 3.5″ “floppies.” MoTU still makes this music software and the original music files can be updated. But it took some doing to find a 1.4 MB floppy drive to transfer the music project files. I still had an old Mac OS-9 laptop that could read the old disks. So I borrowed a Sony USB floppy drive to copy the files to a USB stick. But the second floppy wouldn’t read. I had a hunch it was an 800k floppy and reached out to some compatriots who I thought might be able to help me.

To make things even MORE difficult, it turns out that my PTPro’s floppy drive does not work after all. I had one more old computer to fall back to and it was the one that worked. I have an old Power Computing PowerBase which has a working HDD floppy drive. After reconnecting the Mac SE’s HD to it, I was finally able to make an HDD floppy for you, this time on OS 8.6.

In case you had forgotten (I had), you can’t make a disk copy (clone) of an 800k disk onto a 1.4MB floppy. You have to simply copy the files themselves from one disk to the other. So that’s what I did. Both the original disk and the HDD disk are packaged and will soon be mailed back to you.

I now have all my original Performer files and I am currently looking for composer/musicians who can help me update the files with new voices so the music sounds fresh and polished for today— not limited by what was available 16 years ago.

So check your “archives” now. Load those disks. Try to read/copy the media to current drive technologies. Because old formats don’t die, they just stop working without telling you. Plus, you may not feel your source material is so valuable right now, but it may be very valuable 10, 20 or so years from now.

 

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Feb 08

So Much Better Than Wireless Mics
posted in: Anthony Burokas

By: Anthony Burokas

Sony's WRR-862 ReceiverThe Tascam DR-100

Two things happened recently to quite nearly cement the death of wireless microphone audio for much event and corporate video in America. First, the FCC reallocated the 700 Mhz spectrum to new services. Any wireless microphones on those frequencies, while they still work fine, are now illegal to use, and are subject to more interference – possibly ruining your audio at any moment.

Second, was a new wave of DSLRs being used to shoot video. In the early years of DSLRs there was no way to get audio in the camera, and there was no way to monitor the audio the camera was recording. So the vast majority of videographers who moved to DSLRs to shoot video also moved to what is called “double system” sound- where a second, audio only recorder is used to record audio.

Both of these events hastened a mass migration away from wireless microphones. And here’s what’s happened:

When you consider that these two developments occurred at the same time, you’ll see that a lot of people were looking for new audio solutions. This was the perfect opportunity to change from being limited to 2-tracks in the camera, to using as many audio recorders as you wish to deploy…

The Zoom H4N

 

  • I can have a mic for the main speaker – use a small recorder with a lav mic.
  • I can have a mic for the host to hear them well wherever he or she may wander
  • I can use a recorder’s built-in stereo mics for the string quartet or any music that is played on site
  • I connect another small recorder for a board feed, if available, to get all the different sources- and any I might not have envisioned setting up before the event. Otherwise it can be used as a backup or ambient mic, or maybe even just to put it in front of the speaker if the person running audio won’t give me a feed.
  • I can drop small recorders with lav mics at the podiums to get clean, clear audio without needing the main board feed, or hold them as backups.
  • Lastly, a small stereo recorder sits on my camera to record sound in ambient situations. I will also use it to record the signal from my wireless (if I use it) and use the output of the recorder to feed my cam for a sync track.

Once you get to the studio you sync them up and edit away. You will have lots of audio tracks, but that is a good thing and there are several software options for easily syncing the audio tracks up in the timeline.

The wireless system is still quite useful for much smaller gigs, like corporate work where just one person is speaking to the camera. But wireless audio, even though you can monitor it in the camera while recording, doesn’t mean it will always be good. You can get wireless “hits” as people move around and interference from other radio transmissions. Sometimes, for instance at receptions, someone turns on another wireless mic in another room which conflicts with your wireless. Then you have to waste time finding a clear frequency and changing your gear. Portable recorders have none of these issues.

You can have all the tracks you need with multiple recorders.

 

No video camera could record all these disparate sources unless you had a crew of audio technicians like Robert Altman had for the making of “Nashville” . When I mix the final result together, it is like being there- perhaps even better. If someone with a weak voice does a reading at the podium, I’m not tying to hear her through all the echo & reverberation in the church. I have the mic I placed at the podium and I can crank that up till she’s just as loud as everyone else. In this case my audio is BETTER than being there.

Of course, when the organ kicks in for the recessional, the audio recorders’ auto limiters are put to good use. But some new recorders can even be set to record a second stereo track some 20 db down from the main set to ensure that you have a clean feed. This is also useful for the board mix in case the volunteer working the mixer does not understand what good audio levels are.

So take a good look at your wireless mics, and how you do audio, and see if there isn’t an alternative that gives you better audio, more choices, and avoids any wireless issues.

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Feb 02

Making Your Old CCD Camcorder Continue to Pay Off
posted in: Anthony Burokas

By Anthony Burokas
I’m a gear guy and I have HD gear. Yes, even my phone shoots HD now. But does that mean SD gear is dead? Not at all.

The best kind of money to make is on projects that require no new investment. Because if you’re constantly paying off new gear then you’re not making as much money as you could. So where and how do you use SD gear in the age of HD?

Live from the show floor.

I was hired in January of 2012 to run camera for the local chamber of commerce’s annual awards gala. This is a typical, multi-camera, live, IMAG (image magnification) event, with b-roll played back from DVD players to highlight each of the winners. Why not do it in HD? Consider the delivery. The IMAG screens were 10′ screens flown way above the audience. They were 30-40′ away, at a minimum. Most people would watch the screen across the room so they’d be about 100′ away give or take.  The human eye can only resolve so much detail (and the vast majority of the Chamber membership is older individuals) so putting HD on such a small screen so far away would be worthless endeavor. You could probably count on one hand the number of people there that night who could actually perceive it.

 

 

 

 

The company that was hired for the gig already owns SD gear. Doing it in HD would require renting HD gear from cameras to delivery. By going with SD gear, there’s zero rental cost so all the revenue goes in the pocket. They all work with gear they know. They use the equipment they have and, even despite numerous last minute changes and client additions/deletions, the event goes off flawlessly with many compliments on the coverage and the video playback.

SD all the way to delivery to the hockey parents. They buy this gladly.

The same goes for sporting events. Kids hockey, cheerleading and more. Parents want instant gratification. So would your money be better spent buying new HD gear, or in a fast DVD rack that can quickly duplicate a master DVD you record live during the event. In the time it takes for the kids to change from back into “street clothes,” you have finished DVD’s waiting for the parents to take home at $45 a pop. That makes parents/customers very happy and dramatically lowers your delivery costs.

A sample corporate web interface, with the video delivered smaller than 1/4 frame SD.

How about corporate work. Everything is HD, right? Not really. I spent 5 years working for Merck, one of the largest pharmaceutical companies and for every webcast, even the SD image was sized down to fit the field representative’s laptop screen. On the right of the interface was a live chat, at the bottom were other interface elements- all fitting into 15 or 12″ laptop screens. All the powerpoint presentations were still formatted square to fit the delivery so widescreen video would have been out of place. HD resolutions need not apply.

Did the drummer use "bendy" drumsticks? No. The camera used CMOS chips.

Then consider another advantage of early HDV gear- CCD chips. There’s no rolling shutter, no flash banding, no image distortion. I just finished a corporate video where I shot 1080p24 and conformed to 720p24 so I could do image stabilization in post (the vDSLR lenses I used didn’t offer it) This “windowing” is a great little trick, if it werent’ for the jello I had to contend with after the image was stabilized. The shot may be smooth and even, but the “rolling” shutter was still evident within the frame as various parts jiggled around independent of the stable overall frame. Take particular note of the Magnavox shots. Using my Sony FX1 HDV camcorder with 3 CCD chips would have made this video look a lot better.

So, when considering gear, think of the deliver, think of the need, and re-look at how your existing gear may provide what you need.

 

In the business for 20 years? He doesn't look it. Anthony Burokas is a 20+ year broadcast TV video producer currently based in Dallas TX. He has produced an extensive body of event, corporate, special interest, and broadcast TV. His web site is IEBA.com
Jan 27

The Case for DSLRs
posted in: Anthony Burokas

By Anthony Burokas

vDSLRs have been quite the rage for several years now and they offer two unique qualities that have not been available to lower end videographers before- “filmic” shallow depth of field (DoF), and a more affordable price compared to mid-range prosumer gear, around $4-5,000. A lot of people jumped on the vDSLR bandwagon around the 2012 New Year, when the venerable Panasonic Lumix GH2 dropped from nearly $2000 when it first hit the market, to a year-end sale price of $999 with a 14-140mm kit lens. The Canon 5DmII even dropped from it’s initial lofty highs to under $2000 for the body, each causing holdouts to plunk down some cash to join the vDSLR craze. But is it worth it?

(more…)

Older Posts »